News

FIRST READING: Another Liberal gun policy that neatly ignores where the guns come from


The vast majority of handguns used in crimes are smuggled pieces that are already illegal

Article content

First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent direct to your inbox every Monday to Thursday at 6 p.m. ET (and 9 a.m. on Saturdays), sign up here.

Advertisement 2

Article content

TOP STORY

With Liberal officials now openly mulling the idea of a nationwide ban on handguns, they are simultaneously pursuing reforms that would slacken the penalties for cross-border gun-smugglers.

And according to police in Canada’s most violence-afflicted cities, it’s these smuggled guns that are a far deadlier problem for Canada than the legal ones have ever been.

Starting in 2018, the Trudeau government began examining the possibility of a “full ban on handguns and assault weapons in Canada.” So far, this has only yielded proposals to allow cities to ban handguns at the municipal level — a measure that, while welcomed in the likes of Toronto and Montreal, has been vocally opposed in Alberta.

This week, senior sources quoted by the National Post’s John Ivison said that a total handgun ban remains a “last resort” in the result that more localized bans don’t take.

Meanwhile, the House of Commons is still considering Bill C-5, an act that would repeal a host of mandatory minimum penalties, including those for smuggling firearms.

Bill C-5 was drafted to address what it called “systemic racism in Canada’s criminal justice system.” By reducing the amount of prison time for criminal offences, reads a backgrounder, the idea is to reduce the “overincarceration rate of Indigenous peoples” as well as for other “marginalized Canadians.”

Advertisement 3

Article content

While the bill would reduce prison time for non-violent offences such as drug trafficking or selling black market tobacco, it also repeals the minimum sentences for more than a dozen violent crimes ranging from aggravated sexual assault with a firearm and “hostage taking, use of a firearm.” Four of the bill’s repeals also relate to the gun-smuggling trade, including the charge of “weapons trafficking.”

Nevertheless, it’s smuggled guns that seem to be comprising an ever-growing share of handguns used in crimes.

In February, Toronto Police Deputy Chief Myron Demkiw told the House of Commons public safety committee that of the crime guns his department has been able to trace, 86 per cent were illegal firearms smuggled in from the United States.

Advertisement 4

Article content

When asked about federal efforts to curb Canadian legal gun ownership through buyback programs, Denkiw replied that it “is certainly not going to deal with the crime problem we’re facing in Toronto, as it relates to the use of criminal handguns.”

As far back as 2008, a report by the Province of British Columbia similarly found that the “vast majority” of guns being used illegally in their province originated in the United States.

A 2021 investigation by CityTV outlined just how easy it was to get illegal guns into Ontario from the neighbouring U.S. states of Michigan or New York. Moving firearms into the Greater Toronto area could be as simple as throwing a bag over a border fence to be retrieved later. Illegal firearms were also moved through cross-border First Nations reserves and via secret compartments in private cars — some of which were not even known to the car’s owners.

Advertisement 5

Article content

With vanishingly few exceptions, legal handguns exist in Canada only as antiques or sporting equipment. Any firearm with a barrel shorter than 470 mm cannot be used for hunting, which means that pistols (or “restricted” firearms) occupy a particularly strict realm of Canadian law.

While an unloaded long gun can be kept in the trunk of a vehicle or even legally carried in most jurisdictions, restricted firearms can only really be kept in a safe, at a certified range — or in a vehicle driving between one of those two places.

Legislators in P.E.I. voted this week to ask the federal government to change the name of the Confederation Bridge (pictured) to Epekwitk Crossing. Epekwitk, which means “something lying on the water,” is the traditional Mi’kmaq word for the island. The 12.9 km bridge has connected P.E.I. to the mainland ever since its opening in 1997.
Legislators in P.E.I. voted this week to ask the federal government to change the name of the Confederation Bridge (pictured) to Epekwitk Crossing. Epekwitk, which means “something lying on the water,” is the traditional Mi’kmaq word for the island. The 12.9 km bridge has connected P.E.I. to the mainland ever since its opening in 1997. Photo by Getty Images/iStockphoto

IN OTHER NEWS

The federal government is soon set to begin its official inquiry into Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s unprecedented invocation of the Emergencies Act in order to clear anti-mandate blockades in February. For those hoping for answers on why Ottawa needed to temporarily suspend civil liberties merely to clear a relatively conventional mass-protest, it’s looking like the inquiry will be neatly dodging any uncomfortable findings for the government by only probing the actions of protesters, and not the official response.

Advertisement 6

Article content

This is Mattea Roach, the 23-year-old Halifax-born Jeopardy! contestant who on Friday won her 18th consecutive appearance on the show. With Roach having accumulated US$460,184 in winnings thus far, she said in a recent interview that her history-making winning streak was the only possible way she would ever realistically be able to afford to buy a house in her home country. “On some level, it’s a little bit grim that I had to go on a game show — and not just appear on a game show but be one of literally the top contestants to ever be on that show — to feel like I have now some chance at like having financial security in my twenties,” she told the Toronto Star.
This is Mattea Roach, the 23-year-old Halifax-born Jeopardy! contestant who on Friday won her 18th consecutive appearance on the show. With Roach having accumulated US$460,184 in winnings thus far, she said in a recent interview that her history-making winning streak was the only possible way she would ever realistically be able to afford to buy a house in her home country. “On some level, it’s a little bit grim that I had to go on a game show — and not just appear on a game show but be one of literally the top contestants to ever be on that show — to feel like I have now some chance at like having financial security in my twenties,” she told the Toronto Star. Photo by Jeopardy!

Meanwhile, criticisms have also befallen Canada’s only other active federally sponsored inquiry. The Mass Casualty Commission, an inquiry into the April 2020 mass shooting that killed 22 people in rural Nova Scotia, has been plagued by accusations of mismanagement or bias, particularly after a raft of evidentiary documents mysteriously disappeared from the commission’s official website.

As soaring real estate prices continue to solidify Canada’s standing as one of the world’s most unaffordable places to buy a home, a new Ipsos poll has found that among Canadians who don’t already own a home, 63 per cent of them have already abandoned all hope of ever owning one. The poll comes the same week as a Bloomberg report finding that the average price of a Canadian home is now double that of the average prices of a home in the United States.

Russian ambassador to Canada Oleg Stepanov pictured during a particularly bananas recent interview on CTV’s Question Period. Over a tense 20 minutes, Stepanov repeatedly denied widespread reports of civilian atrocities being committed by Russian troops in Ukraine, saying that mass graves and heavily shelled civilian areas were actually the fault of Ukrainian “neo Nazis.”
Russian ambassador to Canada Oleg Stepanov pictured during a particularly bananas recent interview on CTV’s Question Period. Over a tense 20 minutes, Stepanov repeatedly denied widespread reports of civilian atrocities being committed by Russian troops in Ukraine, saying that mass graves and heavily shelled civilian areas were actually the fault of Ukrainian “neo Nazis.” Photo by CTV

Get all of these insights and more into your inbox every weekday at 6 p.m. ET by signing up for the First Reading newsletter here

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.